Good day to you, my colleagues. I have for you today the third installment of our latest adventure: In Part 1 Miss Alyssa Rynne found some artistic inspiration in Paris, along with some gorgeous lace yarn to send to Miss Julia Sett. In Part 2 Julia replied with her plans for a most ingenious shawl, if she could get her knitting machine to cooporate. Now let us continue the tale with a journal entry of Julia’s, where she is puzzling over that very thing.
From the Journal of Julia Sett:
I have been most fortunate with the operational guidance of the automated knitting machine. It was a bit tricky to begin with – the hooks were not moving smoothly and some would not engage at all. It turns out a moth had gotten into the mechanism and caused the issue. Once I had tracked down the bug and removed it, everything worked much better. I must say I’m not sorry to see that moth meet its demise; they are vile wool-eating creatures.
While the instructions did not work correctly at the first go I was quite pleased to be able to adjust and have it work from then out. I am using a method similar to what I use myself, whereby the machine “reads” the previous row to determine what operations to perform next.
I have finished several iterations of the triangular repeat. It feels about half done and yet I know I will need three times the yarn already used if I do another full iteration. Though I believe I might instead be able to repeat a smaller iteration alternated with two solid triangles for a total of five in that row. Much as the last row contained three triangles, one of which was solid. We shall adjust our figures tomorrow to be sure.
Ah, the mind of a knitting mathematician is interesting place, that’s for certain. However, this isn’t the first time I’ve tried to follow along as my knitter friends explained their on-the-fly pattern rewrites and clever solutions when faced with too little yarn. We know that won’t stop Julia for long, and I’ll have the final exciting installment for you shortly. You won’t want to miss it!